The Application of New Approach Methodologies in Respiratory Disease Research: Their Role in Improving Translational Medicine from Bench to Bedside.

The SARS-CoV-2 outbreak focused global attention on the shortcomings of the drug discovery process. It led to its acceleration in several areas, particularly in the processes associated with the development and approval of COVID-19 vaccines. This situation contrasts with the low approval rates of new drugs for respiratory system diseases (e.g. asthma, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, cancer, tuberculosis), which are leading causes of morbidity and mortality worldwide. In this context, innovation in respiratory system drug discovery is surely needed, and it is most likely to succeed through the use of preclinical models that are cost-effective, high-throughput and generate predictive human-relevant outcomes. Here, we highlight several non-animal new approach methodologies (NAMs) and their applications in respiratory research. We describe their potential uses for efficacy and toxicity assessments, to optimise the drug development process and reduce the high failure rates in clinical trials.

Do we still need animals? Surveying the role of animal-free models in Alzheimer's and Parkinson's disease research.

The use of animals in neuroscience and biomedical research remains controversial. Policy is built around the "3R" principle of "Refining, Reducing and Replacing" animal experiments, and across the globe, different initiatives stimulate the use of animal-free methods. Based on an extensive literature screen to map the development and adoption of animal-free methods in Alzheimer's and Parkinson's disease research, we find that at least two in three examined studies rely on animals or on animal-derived models. Among the animal-free studies, the relative contribution of innovative models that may replace animal experiments is limited. We argue that the distinction between animal research and alternative models presents a false dichotomy, as the role and scientific value of both animal and animal-free approaches are intertwined. Calls to halt all animal experiments appear premature, as insufficient non-animal-based alternatives are available and their development lags behind. In light of this, we highlight the need for objective, unprejudiced monitoring, and more robust performance indicators of animal-free approaches.